4.6 Article

Gastric Cancer in Northern Canadian Populations: A Focus on Cardia and Non-Cardia Subsites

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040534

Keywords

gastric cancer; cardia; incidence; epidemiology; Arctic; Canada; Indigenous health; Helicobacter pylori

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [MOP115031]
  2. Alberta Innovates Health Solutions [201201159]
  3. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  4. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In northern Canada where there is a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection, there is a paucity of information on gastric cancer by the topographical subsites cardia (CGC) and non-cardia (NCGC). Here we describe the incidence of CGC and NCGC, separately, among northern Canadian populations. We used data from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents Volumes X (CI5X) and XI (CI5XI) to obtain CGC and NCGC incidence for Canada and for Yukon (YT), a northern Canadian territory. Using these data with those provided by the Government of the Northwest Territories (NT), we estimated standardized incidence ratios comparing northern populations to Canada as a whole. We also estimated age-standardized incidence rates to permit comparisons across populations globally. NT and YT populations were disproportionately impacted by gastric cancer, particularly NCGC. This was especially true for Indigenous populations: NCGC incidence rates among NT Indigenous men were 2.7 times the rates among all men in Canada, while rates among NT Indigenous women were 3.1 times the rates among all women in Canada. Similarly, age-standardized rates of NCGC among Indigenous NT residents were comparable to global regions where there is a high burden of NCGC. This study has, for the first time, quantified the incidence of CGC and NCGC for the NT and YT, providing new insights into the burden of these cancers among northern Canadian populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available