4.8 Article

Engineering single-atom dynamics with electron irradiation

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav2252

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [ECCS-1610806, DMR/ECCS-1509197]
  2. U.S. DOE Office of Nuclear Energy's NEUP Program [DE-NE0008827]
  3. U.S. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-18-1-0431]
  4. MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies [023674]
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28322-N36]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [756277-ATMEN]
  7. FWF [I3181-N36]
  8. Wiener Wissenschafts-, Forschungs-und Technologiefonds (WWTF) project [MA14-009]
  9. Danish Council for Independent Research
  10. AUFF NOVA project from Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond
  11. EU H2020 RISE 2016-MNR4SCell project
  12. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0305800]
  13. NSFC [14474279]
  14. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB07010100, XDB28000000]
  15. Escuela Politecnica Nacional (EPN) [PIJ-15-09]
  16. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28322] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atomic engineering is envisioned to involve selectively inducing the desired dynamics of single atoms and combining these steps for larger-scale assemblies. Here, we focus on the first part by surveying the single-step dynamics of graphene dopants, primarily phosphorus, caused by electron irradiation both in experiment and simulation, and develop a theory for describing the probabilities of competing configurational outcomes depending on the postcollision momentum vector of the primary knock-on atom. The predicted branching ratio of configurational transformations agrees well with our atomically resolved experiments. This suggests a way for biasing the dynamics toward desired outcomes, paving the road for designing and further upscaling atomic engineering using electron irradiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available