4.8 Review

Cancer nanomedicine for combination cancer immunotherapy

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 398-414

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41578-019-0108-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01AI127070, R01EB022563, R01CA210273, R01CA223804, U01CA210152]
  2. Michigan Translational Research and Commercialization (MTRAC) for Life Sciences Hub
  3. University of Michigan (UM) Forbes Institute for Cancer Discovery Pilot Grant
  4. Emerald Foundation
  5. Melanoma Research Alliance [348774]
  6. US Department of Defense (DoD) Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-16-1-0369]
  7. US National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER Award [1553831]
  8. UM TEAM Training Program (US National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)) [DE007057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer immunotherapy is revolutionizing oncology. However, dose-limiting toxicities and low patient response rates remain major challenges in the clinic. Cancer nanomedicine in combination with immunotherapies offers the possibility to amplify antitumour immune responses and to sensitize tumours to immunotherapies in a safe and effective manner. In this Review, we discuss opportunities for combination immunotherapy based on nanoparticle platforms designed for chemotherapy, photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, radiotherapy and gene therapy. We highlight how nanoparticles can be used to reprogramme the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment and to trigger systemic antitumour immunity, synergizing with immunotherapies against advanced cancer. Finally, we discuss strategies to improve tumour and immune cell targeting while minimizing toxicity and immune-related adverse events, and we explore the potential of theranostic nanoparticles for combination immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available