4.1 Article

Hyperprogression after nivolumab for melanoma: A case report

Journal

JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 244-251

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1078155219845436

Keywords

Hyperprogression; hyperprogressive disease; immunotherapy; melanoma; nivolumab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that selectively blocks the programmed cell death-1. Nowadays, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab are used in the treatment of many different types of cancer. Treatment responses of these agents may be different from standard chemotherapy, and hyperprogression is a new entity that occurs with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We present a case of hyperprogressive disease precipitated by anti-programmed cell death-1 immunotherapy. Case Report A 25-year-old woman was treated with ipilimumab, dabrafenib plus trametinib, and nivolumab, respectively, for stage IV melanoma. Palliative whole brain radiotherapy was completed due to brain metastases before the administration of nivolumab. After the fourth cycle of nivolumab, the patient's general condition deteriorated and control positron emission tomography/computed tomography confirmed hyperprogression. Also, brain magnetic resonance imaging indicated the hyperprogression of the metastatic lesions. Management and Outcome After brain magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed the hyperprogressive disease, nivolumab was discontinued. Cisplatin and dacarbazine were initiated for melanoma. Discussion Anti-programmed cell death-1 immunotherapy is effective in cancers. These agents can precipitate hyperprogressive disease. As the use of anti-programmed cell death-1 agents is expected to rise, physicians should be educated about the potential possibility of hyperprogression during the immunotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available