4.5 Article

A Thermal Inertia Map of Titan

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 1728-1742

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JE005930

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. [NNX13AK97G]
  2. [NNX15AM23G]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Like Earth, the atmosphere of Titan, Saturn's largest moon, is affected by the ability of the surface to store and release heat. Modeling efforts have shown that global temperature distributions and wind profiles differ between simulations describing Titan's surface with a uniform thermal inertia. Cassini-Huygens demonstrated, however, that a variety of morphologies and compositions make up the Titanian landscape. Using data from Cassini RADAR and the Visible and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer, we classified the surface into five terrain types: dune, lake, hummocky, plains, and labyrinth. We estimated the thermal and physical properties (conductivity, specific heat, and density) for each type, creating a 1 degrees x 1 degrees global map of thermal inertia values. For the lakes, as the depth of convection is not yet known, we considered both still and convective bodies. Four simulations of the Titan Atmospheric Model were run with different surface thermal properties: a low homogeneous thermal inertia, a moderate homogeneous, the heterogeneous map with still lakes, and the heterogeneous map with convective lakes. In dry regimes (i.e., without the hydrological cycle), the differences between the four cases were generally minimal, suggesting that general circulation models can use a single (moderate) value for surface thermal inertia value for large-scale investigations that do not consider diurnal variations. Given the importance of hydrological processes and regional spatial diversity on Titan, future work should consider the effects of nonuniform thermal inertia on Titan's climate on local and regional scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available