4.8 Review

The skin microbiome of vertebrates

Journal

MICROBIOME
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0694-6

Keywords

Skin microbiome; 16S rRNA gene; Vertebrates; High-throughput sequencing; Mammals; Amphibians; Birds; Reptiles; Fish

Categories

Funding

  1. Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The skin constitutes the primary physical barrier between vertebrates and their external environment. Characterization of skin microorganisms is essential for understanding how a host evolves in association with its microbial symbionts, modeling immune system development, diagnosing illnesses, and exploring the origins of potential zoonoses that affect humans. Although many studies have characterized the human microbiome with culture-independent techniques, far less is known about the skin microbiome of other mammals, amphibians, birds, fish, and reptiles. The aim of this review is to summarize studies that have leveraged high-throughput sequencing to better understand the skin microorganisms that associate with members of classes within the subphylum Vertebrata. Specifically, links will be explored between the skin microbiome and vertebrate characteristics, including geographic location, biological sex, animal interactions, diet, captivity, maternal transfer, and disease. Recent literature on parallel patterns between host evolutionary history and their skin microbial communities, or phylosymbiosis, will also be analyzed. These factors must be considered when designing future microbiome studies to ensure that the conclusions drawn from basic research translate into useful applications, such as probiotics and successful conservation strategies for endangered and threatened animals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available