4.8 Article

Pulverization-Tolerance and Capacity Recovery of Copper Sulfide for High-Performance Sodium Storage

Journal

ADVANCED SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201900264

Keywords

capacity recovery; pulverization tolerance; semi-coherent interfaces; sodium ion batteries; transmission electron microscopy

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2018R1C1B6002624]
  3. NRF - Korea government (MSIP
  4. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2018M3A7B4065625, NRF-2016M3A7B4024138]
  5. Global Research Development Center Program through the NRF - Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT) [2015K1A4A3047100]
  6. Nano.Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [2009-0082580]
  7. NRF funded Korea government (MSIP
  8. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [NRF-2018H1A2A1060105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Finding suitable electrode materials is one of the challenges for the commercialization of a sodium ion battery due to its pulverization accompanied by high volume expansion upon sodiation. Here, copper sulfide is suggested as a superior electrode material with high capacity, high rate, and long-term cyclability owing to its unique conversion reaction mechanism that is pulverization-tolerant and thus induces the capacity recovery. Such a desirable consequence comes from the combined effect among formation of stable grain boundaries, semi-coherent boundaries, and solid-electrolyte interphase layers. The characteristics enable high cyclic stability of a copper sulfide electrode without any need of size and morphological optimization. This work provides a key finding on high-performance conversion reaction based electrode materials for sodium ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available