4.5 Review

Nanocrystalline Principal Slip Zones and Their Role in Controlling Crustal Fault Rheology

Journal

MINERALS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min9060328

Keywords

nanograins; principal slip zone; crystallographic preferred orientation; amorphization; mirror-slip surface; faults; earthquakes; localization

Funding

  1. Netherlands Centre for Integrated Solid Earth Science (ISES) [2011-75]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [19K14823]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K14823] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Principal slip zones (PSZs) are narrow (<10 cm) bands of localized shear deformation that occur in the cores of upper-crustal fault zones where they accommodate the bulk of fault displacement. Natural and experimentally-formed PSZs consistently show the presence of nanocrystallites in the <100 nm size range. Despite the presumed importance of such nanocrystalline (NC) fault rock in controlling fault mechanical behavior, their prevalence and potential role in controlling natural earthquake cycles remains insufficiently investigated. In this contribution, we summarize the physical properties of NC materials that may have a profound effect on fault rheology, and we review the structural characteristics of NC PSZs observed in natural faults and in experiments. Numerous literature reports show that such zones form in a wide range of faulted rock types, under a wide range of conditions pertaining to seismic and a-seismic upper-crustal fault slip, and frequently show an internal crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) and partial amorphization, as well as forming glossy or mirror-like slip surfaces. Given the widespread occurrence of NC PSZs in upper-crustal faults, we suggest that they are of general significance. Specifically, the generally high rates of (diffusion) creep in NC fault rock may play a key role in controlling the depth limits to the seismogenic zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available