4.5 Review

Non-canonical amino acid labeling in proteomics and biotechnology

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13036-019-0166-3

Keywords

Metabolic labeling; Bioorthogonal chemistry; Residue-specific labeling; Site-specific labeling; Proteomics; Biotechnology

Funding

  1. National Institute for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01AR071359, R21AR069248]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) under CAREER awards [1254148, 1752366]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1752366] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolic labeling of proteins with non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs) provides unique bioorthogonal chemical groups during de novo synthesis by taking advantage of both endogenous and heterologous protein synthesis machineries. Labeled proteins can then be selectively conjugated to fluorophores, affinity reagents, peptides, polymers, nanoparticles or surfaces for a wide variety of downstream applications in proteomics and biotechnology. In this review, we focus on techniques in which proteins are residue- and site-specifically labeled with ncAAs containing bioorthogonal handles. These ncAA-labeled proteins are: readily enriched from cells and tissues for identification via mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis; selectively purified for downstream biotechnology applications; or labeled with fluorophores for in situ analysis. To facilitate the wider use of these techniques, we provide decision trees to help guide the design of future experiments. It is expected that the use of ncAA labeling will continue to expand into new application areas where spatial and temporal analysis of proteome dynamics and engineering new chemistries and new function into proteins are desired.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available