4.1 Article

Serum Biomarkers for the Early Detection of the Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis A Single-Center Prospective Study

Journal

ADVANCES IN NEONATAL CARE
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages E26-E32

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000631

Keywords

biomarkers; early-onset neonatal sepsis; lactoferrin; presepsin; procalcitonin; proinflammatory cytokines

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Reducing the hazards of the early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) is a priority justifying the further investigation for potential biomarkers for its early diagnosis. Purpose: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of presepsin, procalcitonin, lactoferrin, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-8 for the early diagnosis of EONS. Methods: A prospective comparative study, including 30 cases with highly suspected EONS and 30 matched controls, was conducted. Besides the complete blood count and blood culture, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, presepsin, IL-6, IL-8, and lactoferrin were measured at the admission and after 72 hours. Results: At the time of the admission, presepsin, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and IL-8 were significantly higher in the sepsis group. The levels of presepsin, procalcitonin, and IL-8 significantly decreased after 72 hours of the admission. Presepsin, procalcitonin, IL-8, and IL-6 showed a high diagnostic ability for sepsis at admission with area under the curve of 0.934, 0.798, 0.775, and 0.751, respectively. The cutoff values of presepsin, procalcitonin, IL-8, and IL-6 were 821 pg/mL, 2.3 ng/mL, 54 pg/mL, and 24 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 88.9%, 72.2%, 83.3%, and 94.4% and specificity of 85.7%, 80.9%, 71.4%, and 52.4%, respectively. Lactoferrin had the lowest diagnostic ability with area under the curve of 0.558. Implications for Research: Further studies are needed to investigate the diagnostic ability of the combination of these biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available