4.8 Article

Highly exposed ruthenium-based electrocatalysts from bimetallic metal-organic frameworks for overall water splitting

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.085

Keywords

Ruthenium; Metal-organic frameworks; Electrocatalysis; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Water splitting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51825201]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206701]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  4. Changjiang Scholar Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of highly exposed active sites and highly active inexpensive electrocatalysts is important and challengeable for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Herein, we report a bimetallic metal-organic frameworks based strategy to fabricate Ru-based electrocatalysts with high exposure of the Ru active sites (Ru-HPC, ruthenium-decorated hierarchically porous carbon) for high efficient hydrogen evolution. Remarkably, Ru-HPC achieves a current density of 25 mA cm(geo)(-2) at an overpotential of 22.7 mV, and shows an ultrahigh turnover frequency of 1.79 H-2 s(-1) at 25 mV, which is almost twice higher than that of commercial Pt/C. The electrochemical HER performance of Ru-HPC surpasses most of the electrocatalysts reported so far in alkaline solutions. Besides, a two-electrode water splitting device is constructed with Ru-HPC and porous RuO2 (obtained by oxidizing Ru-HPC) as electrode materials, which achieves a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) at only 1.53 V. This work provides a facile strategy to fabricate high-performance metal-carbon hybrid electrocatalysts with abundant exposed active sites from bimetallic MOFs, which can hopefully be applied to many other metals-carbon hybrids for various electrochemical applications in the foreseeable future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available