4.3 Article

Distribution, Function and Polymorphism Characteristics of Microsatellites in Pyropia yezoensis Transcriptome

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 693-700

Publisher

OCEAN UNIV CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s11802-019-3817-6

Keywords

P; yezoensis; transcriptome; SSR; distribution; function; polymorphism

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31372517, 31672641]
  2. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [2015ASKJ02]
  3. Project of National Infrastructure of Fishery Germplasm Resources [2016DKA30470]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201762016, 201562018, 201564009]
  5. Program for Chinese Outstanding Talents in Agriculture Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution, putative function and polymorphism characteristics of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in P. yezoensis transcriptome were analyzed in this study. In tota., 307. SSRs were detected among 2681 unigenes. Trinucleotide types were dominant, constituting 91.87% of all the microsatellites. The most abundant SSR was CCG (71.03%) and the second abundant one was AGC (234, 7.61%). A total of 111 (3.61%) dinucleotide types were found and the most abundant one was AC (51, 1.66%) which was followed by CG (34, 1.11%). SSRs identified showed a GC bases preference; GC bases constituted 89.73% of all the SSR bases. SSRs occurrence number decreased as repetitions increased. Annotation results exhibited that the majority of SSRs-containing unigenes have the functions of metabolic process', binding' and catalytic activity' and existed as the forms of cell', cell component' and organelle'. The dominant amino acids that SSRs coded were Ala (28.59%), Arg (26.02%), Gly (14.35%) and Pro (13.65%). Amplification results showed that 3 out 23 SSRs from transcriptome (13.04%) and 8 out 77 SSRs from genome (10.39%) were polymorphic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available