4.6 Article

Differentiation of Bacillus thuringiensis From Bacillus cereus Group Using a Unique Marker Based on Real-Time PCR

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00883

Keywords

B. thuringiensis; transcriptional regulator; crystal protein; kimbap; spinach; lettuce

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Drug Safety of Republic of Korea [14162MFDS085]
  2. Kangwon National University
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201408260054]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2018007551]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficiency of a novel biomarker (the transcriptional regulator, XRE) was tested and evaluated in differentiating Bacillus thuringiensis from Bacillus cereus group species in environmental and spiked samples based on PCR and real-time PCR. Totally 120 strains, representing two bacterial groups, B. cereus group and non-Bacillus sp., were used to evaluate the performance of XRE and crystal protein (cry2, an existing biomarker). Further, three diverse samples (kimbap, lettuce, and spinach) were inoculated with B. thuringiensis and prominent biomarkers XRE and cry2 were used as targets. Direct analysis of the detection results for the pure cultures of B. cereus group wild-types, references and type strains revealed an accuracy rate of 97.5% targeting XRE, and 83.3% targeting cry2. The real-time PCR was constructed with a R-2-value of 0.993. For the artificially contaminated samples, a concentration of 10(3) CFU/g of B. thuringiensis in spiked food samples could be detected using real-time PCR targeting XRE. A good performance was obtained with XRE in discriminating B. thuringiensis from B. cereus groups, as well as detecting B. thuringiensis in spiked food samples with PCR or real-time PCR. Therefore, this real-time PCR targeting XRE can be used as a dependable and promising tool to identify B. thuringiensis in foods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available