4.5 Article

The dosage effects of dexamethasone on osteogenic activity andbiocompatibility of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/hydroxyapatite nanofibers

Journal

ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 1823-1832

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1609007

Keywords

Electrospun nanofibers; poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/hydroxyapatite; dexamethasone; biocompatibility

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600823]
  2. Science Technology Program of Jilin Province [20170520009JH]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611332]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1102803]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) based biomaterials have many advantages and potential applications in bone tissue engineering. Whereas, a significant problem which could not be ignored was that the acidic by-products generated during its degradation induced severe inflammatory reactions and negatively regulated bone regeneration. In this research, feasibility of using dexamethasone (Dex) to improve the biocompatibility of PLGA is investigated in detail. Hereby, various contents of PLGA/hydroxyapatite (PH) nanofibers loaded with Dex were synthesized by electrospinning technique. It was shown that 0.5% (wt) Dex in PH scaffolds was the minimum content which was required for anti-inflammatory effect. Admittedly, Dex to some extent had cytotoxic effect on osteoblasts and an inhibitory effect on ALP activity in this study; nevertheless, the relatively low Dex (<2% [wt]) had no inhibitory effects on osteoblasts maturation and mineralization. By this token, Dex is a good candidate for improving biocompatibility of PLGA based biomaterials. Moreover, the cytotoxic effects of Dex should be concerned. This study will provide a rationale for optimizing biocompatibility of PLGA based biomaterials by using Dex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available