4.6 Article

Distinct evolutionary dynamics of horizontal gene transfer in drug resistant and virulent clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008114

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Viertel Foundation of Australia Senior Medical Research Fellowship
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle [OPP1175797]
  3. University of Melbourne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Klebsiella pneumoniae has emerged as an important cause of two distinct public health threats: multi-drug resistant (MDR) healthcare-associated infections and drug susceptible community-acquired invasive infections. These pathotypes are generally associated with two distinct subsets of K. pneumoniae lineages or clones' that are distinguished by the presence of acquired resistance genes and several key virulence loci. Genomic evolutionary analyses of the most notorious MDR and invasive community-associated (hypervirulent') clones indicate differences in terms of chromosomal recombination dynamics and capsule polysaccharide diversity, but it remains unclear if these differences represent generalised trends. Here we leverage a collection of >2200 K. pneumoniae genomes to identify 28 common clones (n 10 genomes each), and perform the first genomic evolutionary comparison. Eight MDR and 6 hypervirulent clones were identified on the basis of acquired resistance and virulence gene prevalence. Chromosomal recombination, surface polysaccharide locus diversity, pan-genome, plasmid and phage dynamics were characterised and compared. The data showed that MDR clones were highly diverse, with frequent chromosomal recombination generating extensive surface polysaccharide locus diversity. Additional pan-genome diversity was driven by frequent acquisition/loss of both plasmids and phage. In contrast, chromosomal recombination was rare in the hypervirulent clones, which also showed a significant reduction in pan-genome diversity, largely driven by a reduction in plasmid diversity. Hence the data indicate that hypervirulent clones may be subject to some sort of constraint for horizontal gene transfer that does not apply to the MDR clones. Our findings are relevant for understanding the risk of emergence of individual K. pneumoniae strains carrying both virulence and acquired resistance genes, which have been increasingly reported and cause highly virulent infections that are extremely difficult to treat. Specifically, our data indicate that MDR clones pose the greatest risk, because they are more likely to acquire virulence genes than hypervirulent clones are to acquire resistance genes. Author summary Klebsiellla pneumoniae is classified by the World Health Organization as a priority drug-resistant organism because it causes a significant burden of hospital infections that are extremely difficult to treat. However, outside of the hospital setting this bacterium is also an important cause of severe drug-susceptible infections. Until recently these two infection types were associated with distinct subsets of the K. pneumoniae population harbouring high prevalence of drug-resistance and virulence genes, respectively. However, there are now increasing reports of highly-virulent and difficult-to-treat K. pneumoniae strains that carry both resistance and virulence genes. In this study, we used genomic analyses to characterise and compare the evolutionary histories of drug-resistant and virulent K. pneumoniae. We show that the former are highly diverse, frequently acquiring novel genes through the processes of chromosomal recombination, plasmid and bacteriophage acquisition. In comparison, the latter show considerably lower gene content diversity, suggesting that they may be subject to some sort of limitation for gene acquisition. Consequently, we predict that drug-resistant K. pneumoniae are more likely to acquire virulence genes than virulent K. pneumoniae are to acquire drug-resistance genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available