4.2 Article

Assessment of a medical information system: the mediating role of use and user satisfaction on the success of human interaction with the mobile healthcare system (iHeart)

Journal

COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 281-305

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-019-00565-4

Keywords

Medical information system; mHealth; Human-computer interaction; Assessment; Success; Use; User satisfaction

Funding

  1. School of Computer Sciences and Institute of Postgraduate Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia
  2. Universiti Sains Malaysia
  3. School of Computer Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

iHeart is a mobile healthcare system which monitors and tracks patients with hypertension and arrhythmia. This empirical study aims to assess the interaction between human and iHeart. In line with this, a survey was conducted among healthcare professional in two cities of Isfahan and Penang to find how intention to Use of iHeart and User satisfaction conveys the role of effective factors [Information Quality (IQ), Service Quality (SQ), System Quality (SysQ), Trust (Tr), Anxiety (Ax), and mHealth Literacy (mHL)] to the Success of Human Interaction (SHI) with iHeart. The total number of 323 respondents returned the questionnaire. Using DeLone and McLean IS success model, a conceptual model was developed to identify the mediating effects of Use and User satisfaction. Covariance-based structural equation modelling was applied for data analysis using the statistical software AMOS. In this study, mediation effect was examined in three different methods including Baron and Kenny, Sobel test, and Bootstrapping technique. The most reliable results are from bootstrapping technique, which indicate that Use mediates the effects of SysQ, Tr, and mHL on SHI. In addition, User satisfaction is a mediator between SysQ, SQ, and mHL with SHI. Ultimately, IQ has direct effect on SHI without involvement of mediator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available