Journal
BMJ OPEN
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages -Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025799
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- US National Institutes of Health [R25DA037756]
- Canada Research Chairs program through a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Inner City Medicine
- European Commission [701698]
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research through the Canadian Research Initiative on Substance Misuse [SMN-139148]
- Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research/St. Paul's Foundation Scholar Award
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective To assess the efficacy of slow release oral morphine (SROM) as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data sources Three electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also searched the following electronic registers for ongoing trials: ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials and the EU Clinical Trials Register. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies We included RCTs of all durations, assessing the effect of SROM on measures of treatment retention, heroin use and craving in adults who met the diagnostic criteria for OUD. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed (chi(2) statistic) and quantified (I-2 statistic) and a sensitivity analysis was undertaken to assess the impact of particular high-risk trials. Results Among 1315 records screened and four studies reviewed, four unique randomised trials met the inclusion criteria (n=471), and compared SROM with methadone. In the meta-analysis, we observed no significant differences between SROM and methadone in improving treatment retention (RR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.02, p=0.34) and heroin use (RR=0.96; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.52, p=0.86). Craving data was not amenable to meta-analysis. Available data implied no differences in adverse events, heroin, cocaine or benzodiazepine use. Conclusions Meta-analysis of existing randomised trials suggests SROM may be generally equal to methadone in retaining patients in treatment and reducing heroin use while potentially resulting in less craving. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was low-to-moderate.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available