4.7 Article

Habitual Breakfast Patterns Do Not Influence Appetite and Satiety Responses in Normal vs. High-Protein Breakfasts in Overweight Adolescent Girls

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11061223

Keywords

breakfast; protein; habitual breakfast patterns; fullness; intake

Funding

  1. Beef Checkoff
  2. Egg Nutrition Center/American Egg Board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differences in postprandial insulin, glucose, and/or free fatty acid concentrations, following the consumption of breakfast, have been demonstrated to be dependent on habitual breakfast patterns. This study examined the effects of habitual breakfast patterns on postprandial appetite, satiety, and hormonal responses along with daily food intake following the consumption of normal-protein (NP) vs. higher-protein (HP) breakfasts in overweight adolescents. Thirty-seven girls (age: 19 +/- 1 year; BMI: 29.0 +/- 3.4 kg/m(2)) participated in the semi-randomized crossover design study. Participants were grouped according to whether they habitually skipped (SKIP, n = 18) or consumed breakfast (CONSUME, n = 19), and consumed a NP (350 kcal; 13 g protein) or HP (350 kcal; 35 g protein) breakfast for 3 days/pattern. On day 4, breakfast was provided, and appetite questionnaires and blood samples were collected throughout an 8 h testing day. Daily food intake was also assessed. Regardless of habitual breakfast patterns, the consumption of HP breakfast led to greater daily fullness (29,030 +/- 6,010 min x mm) vs. NP breakfast (26,910 +/- 5580 min x mm; p = 0.03). Daily protein consumption was greater (98 +/- 15 g vs. 78 +/- 15 g), and carbohydrate consumption was lower (331 +/- 98 g vs. 367 +/- 94 g) with HP vs. NP (both, p < 0.001). No other differences were observed. These data suggest that the recommendation to consume a HP breakfast for improved satiety and ingestive behavior is appropriate for overweight adolescent girls, regardless of habitual breakfast patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available