4.7 Article

Differences in Maternal Immunoglobulins within Mother's Own Breast Milk and Donor Breast Milk and across Digestion in Preterm Infants

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11040920

Keywords

passive immunization; antibodies; lactation; prematurity; proteolysis; breast milk

Funding

  1. K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Career Award
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver Institute of Child Health & Development of the National Institutes of Health [R00HD079561]
  3. Gerber Foundation [2017-1586]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maternal antibody transfer to the newborn provides essential support for the infant's naive immune system. Preterm infants normally receive maternal antibodies through mother's own breast milk (MBM) or, when mothers are unable to provide all the milk required, donor breast milk (DBM). DBM is pasteurized and exposed to several freeze-thaw cycles, which could reduce intact antibody concentration and the antibody's resistance to digestion within the infant. Whether concentrations of antibodies in MBM and DBM differ and whether their survival across digestion in preterm infants differs remains unknown. Feed (MBM or DBM), gastric contents (MBM or DBM at 1-h post-ingestion) and stool samples (collected after a mix of MBM and DBM feeding) were collected from 20 preterm (26-36 weeks gestational age) mother-infant pairs at 8-9 and 21-22 days of postnatal age. Samples were analyzed via ELISA for the concentration of secretory IgA (SIgA), total IgA (SIgA/IgA), total IgM (SIgM/IgM) and IgG. Total IgA, SIgA, total IgM and IgG concentrations were 55.0%, 71.6%, 98.4% and 41.1% higher in MBM than in DBM, and were 49.8%, 32.7%, 73.9% and 39.7% higher in gastric contents when infants were fed with MBM than when infants were fed DBM, respectively. All maternal antibody isotypes present in breast milk were detected in the infant stools, of which IgA (not sIgA) was the most abundant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available