4.7 Review

Associations of ADIPOQ and LEP Gene Variants with Energy Intake: A Systematic Review

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11040750

Keywords

ADIPOQ; LEP; energy intake; adipocytokines; leptin

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil [88887.149709/2017-00]
  2. Fundo de Apoio a Pesquisa - FAP/UNIVILLE Brazil [01/2014]
  3. Alberta Research Chair in Nutrition and Disease Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review aims to evaluate the association of adiponectin (ADIPOQ) and leptin (LEP) gene variants with energy intake. Cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies that reported an association of leptin and/or adiponectin gene variants with energy intake were included in this review. Human studies without any age restrictions were considered eligible. Detailed individual search strategies were developed for each of the following bibliographic databases: Cochrane, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (LILACS), PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Risk of bias assessment was adapted from the Downs and Black scale and was used to evaluate the methodology of the included studies. Seven studies with a pooled population of 2343 subjects were included. The LEP and ADIPOQ gene variants studied were LEP-rs2167270 (k = 1), LEP-rs7799039 (k = 5), ADIPOQ-rs2241766 (k = 2), ADIPOQ-rs17300539 (k = 1), and ADIPOQ marker D3S1262 (k = 1). Two of the seven studies reviewed demonstrated a positive association between the LEP-rs7799039 polymorphism and energy intake. Two other studiesone involving a marker of the ADIPOQ gene and one examining the ADIPOQ-rs17300539 polymorphismalso reported associations with energy intake. More research is needed to further elucidate the contributions of genetic variants to energy metabolism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available