4.6 Article

A Comparative Study on Johnson Cook, Modified Zerilli-Armstrong, and Arrhenius-Type Constitutive Models to Predict Compression Flow Behavior of SnSbCu Alloy

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma12101726

Keywords

SnSbCu alloy; flow behavior; Johnson-Cook model; modified Zerilli-Armstrong model; Arrhenius-type model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809057]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3072019CFM0302, CDGC01-KT11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy is studied experimentally by the compression tests in the range of the strain rates from 0.0001 to 0.1 s(-1) and temperature from 293 to 413 K. Based on the experimental data, three constitutive models including the Johnson-Cook (J-C), modified Zerilli-Armstrong (Z-A), and Arrhenius-type (A-type) models are compared to find out an optimum model to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy. The results show that the J-C model could predict the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy accurately only at some specific strain rates and temperature near the reference values. The modified Z-A and A-type constitutive models can give better fitting results than the J-C model. While, at high strains, the predictive values of the modified Z-A model have larger errors than those at low strains, which means this model has limitations at high strains. By comparison, the A-type model could predict the experimental results accurately at the whole strain range, which indicates that it is a more suitable choice to describe the flow behavior of the SnSbCu alloy in the focused range of strain rates and temperatures. The work is beneficial to solve the tribological problem of the bearing of the marine engine by integrating the accurate constitutive model into the corresponding numerical model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available