4.8 Article

Quantification of Heterogeneous Degradation in Li-Ion Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201900674

Keywords

chemomechanical interplay; fast charging; finite elemental modeling; NMC cathode; structural degradation; X-ray phase contrast tomography

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542152, DMR-1832613, DMR-1832707]
  3. DOE Vehicle Technologies Program (VTP) within Applied Battery Research (ABR) for Transportation Program
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0400900]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11535015, U1632110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multiscale chemomechanical interplay in lithium-ion batteries builds up mechanical stress, provokes morphological breakdown, and leads to state of charge heterogeneity. Quantifying the interplay in complex composite electrodes with multiscale resolution constitutes a frontier challenge in precisely diagnosing the fading mechanism of batteries. In this study, hard X-ray phase contrast tomography, capable of nanoprobing thousands of active particles at once, enables an unprecedented statistical analysis of the chemomechanical transformation of composite electrodes under fast charging conditions. The damage heterogeneity is demonstrated to prevail at all length scales, which stems from the unbalanced electron conduction and ionic diffusion, and collectively leads to the nonuniform utilization of active particles spatially and temporally. This study highlights that the statistical mapping of the chemomechanical transformation offers a diagnostic method for the particles utilization and fading, hence could improve electrode formulation for fast-charging batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available