4.8 Review

Multienzymatic Cascade Reactions via Enzyme Complex by Immobilization

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 4402-4425

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b04921

Keywords

multienzymatic cascade reactions; multienzyme immobilization; random co-immobilization; compartmentalization; positional co-immobilization

Funding

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the Encouragement Program for the Industries of Economic Cooperation Region [P0006145]
  2. Fundamental R&D Program - Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering & Technology (KICET)
  3. MOTIE, Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multienzymatic cascade reactions are a most important technology to succeed in industrial process development, such as synthesis of pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and nutritional compounds. Different strategies to construct multienzyme structures have been widely reported. Enzymes complexes are designed by three types of routes: (i) fusion proteins, (ii) enzyme scaffolds, or (iii) immobilization. As a result, enzyme complexes can enhance cascade enzymatic activity through substrate channeling. In particular, recent advances in materials science have led to syntheses of various materials applicable for enzyme immobilization. This review discusses different cases for assembling multienzyme complexes via random co-immobilization, compartmentalization, and positional co-immobilization. The advantages of using immobilized multienzymes include not only improved cascade enzymatic activity via substrate channeling but also enhanced enzyme stability and ease of recovery for reuse. In this review, we also consider the latest studies of different model enzyme reactions immobilized on various support materials, as multienzyme systems allow for economical product synthesis through bioprocesses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available