4.4 Review

Feature Extraction Methods in Language Identification: A Survey

Journal

WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages 2071-2103

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-019-06373-3

Keywords

Feature extraction; Language identification; Noise compensation; Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC); Shifted delta cepstral coefficients (SDCs)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Language Identification (LI) is one of the widely emerging field in the areas of speech processing to accurately identify the language from the data base based on some features of the speech signal. LI technologies have a wide set of applications in different spheres due to the growing advancement in the field of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Feature extraction is one of the fundamental and significant process performed in LI. This review presents main paradigms of research in Feature Extraction methods that will provide a deep insight to the researchers about the feature extraction techniques for future studies in LI. Broadly, this review summarizes and compare various feature extraction approaches with and without noise compensation techniques as the current trend is towards robust universal Language Identification framework. This paper categorizes the different feature extraction approaches on the basis of different features, human speech production system/peripheral auditory system, spectral or cepstral analysis, and lastly on the basis of transform. Moreover, the different noise compensation-based feature extraction techniques are also covered in the review. This paper also presents, that Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are the most popular approach. Results indicates that MFCC fused with other feature vectors and cleansing approaches gives improved performance as compared to the pure MFCC based Feature Extraction approaches. This study also describes the different categories at the front end of the LI system from research point of view.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available