4.3 Article

Detecting students-at-risk in computer programming classes with learning analytics from students' digital footprints

Journal

USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 759-788

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-019-09234-7

Keywords

Computer Science Education; Learning analytics; Predictive modelling; Machine learning; Peer learning; Educational data mining

Funding

  1. Irish Research Council
  2. National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Ireland [GOIPG/2015/3497]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland [12/RC/2289]
  4. Fulbright Ireland
  5. Irish Research Council (IRC) [GOIPG/2015/3497] Funding Source: Irish Research Council (IRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different sources of data about students, ranging from static demographics to dynamic behavior logs, can be harnessed from a variety sources at Higher Education Institutions. Combining these assembles a rich digital footprint for students, which can enable institutions to better understand student behaviour and to better prepare for guiding students towards reaching their academic potential. This paper presents a newresearch methodology to automatically detect students at-risk of failing an assignment in computer programming modules (courses) and to simultaneously support adaptive feedback. By leveraging historical student data, we built predictive models using students' offline (static) information including student characteristics and demographics, and online (dynamic) resources using programming and behaviour activity logs. Predictions are generated weekly during semester. Overall, the predictive and personalised feedback helped to reduce the gap between the lower and higher-performing students. Furthermore, students praised the prediction and the personalised feedback, conveying strong recommendations for future students to use the system. We also found that students who followed their personalised guidance and recommendations performed better in examinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available