4.5 Article

SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY OF BREAST LESIONS: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF ELASTIC HETEROGENEITY IMPROVES DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 8, Pages 1909-1917

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.04.019

Keywords

Heterogeneity; Shear wave elastography; Elastography; Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether quantitative analysis of elastic heterogeneity (EH) could improve the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE) in breast lesions. From August 2016 to August 2017, 280 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All lesions were evaluated with the ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and SWE with Virtual Touch tissue imaging quantification. The shear wave velocity (SWV) of the three areas of highest stiffness and lowest stiffness within the lesions were measured to calculate the maximum SWV (SWVmax), mean SWV (SWVmean) and EH. The EH was determined as the difference between the averaged highest SWV and lowest SWV. The diagnostic performance- including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the sensitivity and specificity of BI-RADS, EH, SWVmax and SWVmean-were analyzed. The AUC of EH, SWVmax and SWVmean were 0.963, 0.949 and 0.937, respectively. The sensitivity of EH was 93.75%, which was significantly higher than that of SWVmax (84.37%) and SWVmean (84.37%) (p < 0.001); there was no significant difference in the specificity among EH, SWVmax and SWVmean (p > 0.05). For category 4A lesions, EH predicted all the malignant lesions, while two cancers were misdiagnosed by SWVmax and SWVmean, respectively. Quantitative analysis of EH can improve the sensitivity of SWE for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions without loss of specificity. (C) 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available