4.7 Article

Changes of amygdalin and volatile components of apricot kernels during the ultrasonically-accelerated debitterizing

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104614

Keywords

Apricot kernels; Debitterizing; Amygdalin; Epimerization; Volatile components

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31101324]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China [2015JM3097]
  3. Technology Transfer Promotion Project of Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China [2017071CG/RC034(SXSF003)]
  4. Key Research Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China [2017NY-167, 2018ZDXM-NY-086]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [GK201602005, GK201802012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrasound has been regarded as an efficient novel technique for debitterizing of the apricot kernels, but its influence is severely concerned on the possible epimerization of D-amygdalin to the L-amygdalin, a more potentially toxigenic compound. Considering this, the experiments were conducted to investigate the epimerization of D-amygdalin and the volatile components in the debitterizing water, which were separated and identified by the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography with a mass spectrometer (GCMS), respectively. The results indicate that the ultrasonically-debitterizing did not cause the epimerization of Damygdalin to the L-amygdalin, while the procedure can be greatly accelerated due to the rapid mass transfer and degradation of D-amygdalin induced by ultrasound irradiation. In addition, the water from the ultrasonically-debitterizing of apricot kernels exerted more aromas compared with that of the conventional debitterizing, which might have more applications about this kind of water. In a word, ultrasound can be safely applied in the debitterizing industry of apricot kernels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available