4.5 Article

Five-Stage Selection Procedure of Ionic Liquids for Lubrication of Steel-Steel Contacts in Space Mechanisms

Journal

TRIBOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-019-1185-4

Keywords

Space; Ionic Liquids; Fomblin((R)) Z25; Thermal Stability; Corrosion; Vacuum Tribology

Funding

  1. Austrian Space Applications Programme (ASAP) [840068]
  2. Austrian COMET-Program via the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) [849109]
  3. Province of Niederosterreich
  4. Province of Vorarlberg
  5. Province of Wien

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental approach using the stage-gate process is presented to efficiently select and assess ionic liquids (ILs) for their usability in space mechanisms, thus, for their potential to replace commonly used liquid lubricants based on perfluorinated polyethers and multiply alkylated cyclopentanes. This methodology was based on a five-stage selection procedure comprising the determination of rheological properties, outgassing properties, corrosion-inhibiting capabilities, screening of friction and wear performance in vacuum, which was completed by tribometrical lifetime assessments. Five ILs were benchmarked against Fomblin((R)) Z25 as reference at the end of each stage and selected for the next stage depending on the performance. One IL of the type pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide outperformed Fomblin((R)) Z25 in all stages except pour point. Thus, only in the case of fluidity at verylow temperature showed Fomblin((R)) Z25 a better performance. Additives slightly improved corrosion inhibition of this IL but showed adverse effects on friction and wear in comparison to the neat IL. In lifetime experiments, the IL resulted in a lifetime extension of at least factor 23 and 31 compared to the reference. Even with the use of additives in this IL, the lifetime extension was still by a factor of 6 to 15 compared to Fomblin((R)) Z25.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available