4.7 Article

Designing locations and capacities for charging stations to support intercity travel of electric vehicles: An expanded network approach

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.013

Keywords

Electric vehicles; Long-distance travel; Charging stations; Neighborhood search heuristic; Infrastructure planning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51622807, 71871126, U1766205, 71332005, 59475035, 91746210]
  2. National Science and Technology Support Program [2014BAG03B04]
  3. Tsinghua-Daimler Joint Research Center for Sustainable Transportation, Joint Laboratory for Future Transport and Urban Computing of AutoNavi
  4. National Engineering Laboratory for Green and Safe Construction Technology in Urban Rail Transit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is devoted to designing locations and capacities of charging stations for supporting long-distance travel by electric vehicles (EVs). We first establish an expanded network structure to model the set of valid charging strategies for EV drivers, and then a variational inequality (VI) is formulated to capture the equilibrated route-choice and charging behaviors of EVs by incorporating an approximated queuing time function for a capacitated charging facility. Next, we formulate the problem of designing the locations and capacities of charging facilities under a fixed budget constraint and solve the optimization problem with a customized neighborhood search strategy. A lower bound for the system cost is also developed to evaluate the qualities of solutions acquired using our proposed heuristic. Numerical examples with a toy network and a highway network extracted from the Yangtze River Delta are used to show the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, and we observe that our strategy can solve a large-scale problem within an optimality gap of less than 5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available