Journal
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 67
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 567-585Publisher
ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033352
Keywords
DOHaD; causal inference; instrumental variable; negative control; cross-contextual comparison; twin study
Categories
Funding
- MRC [MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/6] Funding Source: UKRI
- British Heart Foundation Funding Source: Medline
- Cancer Research UK Funding Source: Medline
- Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/6, MR/K023195/1, MC_UU_12013/1] Funding Source: Medline
- Medical Research Council [1046634] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Studies of the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) often rely on prospective observational data, from which associations between developmental exposures and outcomes in later life can be identified. Typically, conventional statistical methods are used in an attempt to mitigate problems inherent in observational data, such as confounding and reverse causality, but these have serious limitations. In this review, we discuss a variety of methods that are increasingly being used in observational epidemiological studies to help strengthen causal inference. These methods include negative controls, cross-contextual designs, instrumental variables (including Mendelian randomization), family-based studies, and natural experiments. Applications within the DOHaD framework, and in relation to behavioral, psychiatric, and psychological domains, are considered, and the considerable potential for expanding the use of these methods is outlined.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available