4.6 Article

Preparation and Investigation of Silver Nanoparticle-Antibody Bioconjugates for Electrochemical Immunoassay of Tick-Borne Encephalitis

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19092103

Keywords

Bioconjugates; silver nanoparticles; antibodies; tick-borne encephalitis virus; cathodic linear sweep voltammetry (CLSV); gold-carbon composite electrode (GCCE); electrochemical immunosensor

Funding

  1. Tomsk Polytechnic University [4.5752.2017/BP]
  2. project Research in Pharmaceuticals and Biomaterials of the University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague [A2_FCHT_2019_058]
  3. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [17-03868S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new simple electrochemical immunosensor approach for the determination of antibodies to tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in immunological products was developed and tested. The assay is performed by detecting the silver reduction signal in the bioconjugates with antibodies (Ab@AgNP). Here, signal is read by cathodic linear sweep voltammetry (CLSV) through the detection of silver chloride reduction on a gold-carbon composite electrode (GCCE). Covalent immobilization of the antigen on the electrode surface was performed after thiolation and glutarization of the GCCE. Specific attention has been paid to the selection of conditions for stabilizing both the silver nanoparticles and their Ab@AgNP. A simple flocculation test with NaCl was used to select the concentration of antibodies, and the additional stabilizer bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used for Ab@AgNP preparation. The antibodies to TBEV were quantified in the range from 50 IUmL(-1) to 1600 IUmL(-1), with a detection limit of 50 IUmL(-1). The coefficient of determination (r(2)) is 0.989. The electrochemical immunosensor was successfully applied to check the quality of immunological products containing IgG antibodies to TBEV. The present work paves the path for a novel method for monitoring TBEV in biological fluids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available