4.7 Article

Riverine nutrient fluxes and environmental effects on China's estuaries

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 661, Issue -, Pages 130-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.120

Keywords

Estuaries; Nutrient fluxes; Nutrient limitation; Eutrophication

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0502901]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41771500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increase in riverine nutrient fluxes significantly influences the estuarine ecosystem. This study collected nutrient data in most of China's rivers from 1963 to 2015 to estimate the nutrient fluxes from major rivers and analyze interannual variability of nutrient fluxes and estuarine environmental effects. The results showed that the nutrient fluxes from the Yangtze River increased annually from 1963 to 2012. The trend of nutrient fluxes from the Yellow River was consistent with that from the Jiulong River, i.e., nutrient fluxes increased from 1998 to 2007 and then decreased. The areal nutrient fluxes from China's major rivers were higher than those from major world rivers, while the areal nutrient yield rates per capita were lower than those from major world rivers. We also found that China's estuaries were predominantly phosphorus-limited and slowly moving toward lower dissolved silica over dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DSi:DIN) ratios with time. Meanwhile, the nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth in most of China's estuary systems was moving toward a higher incidence of phosphorus and silicon limitations as a result of increased DIN fluxes, and this would likely alter phytoplankton communities. Furthermore, the decreases in the DSi: DIN ratio and dissolved silica over dissolved inorganic phosphate (DSi:DIP) ratio, and the increases in both DIN and DIP fluxes, caused increased red tide blooms. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available