4.7 Article

Effects of ZnO nanoparticles on the toxicity of cadmium to duckweed Lemna minor

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 662, Issue -, Pages 697-702

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.275

Keywords

Cadmium; Duckweed; IC50; Nano-ZnO; Physiological parameters

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LY19C030003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670511]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018PC003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Release of nanoparticles into the aquatic environment will inevitably influence the behavior and toxicities of other existing pollutants. In the present study, 10 mg/L of nano-ZnO (diameter 20-30 nm) was used to evaluate its impacts on cadmium(Cd) toxicity on duckweed Lemnaminor based on IC50 values and four biological parameters including percent inhibition of growth rate (I-r), ratio of chlorophyll/pheophytin (D665/D665a), antioxidant enzymes, and H+-ATPase. Results of the 96-h IC50 values of Cd with or without nano-ZnO indicate no additional toxicological effects of nano-ZnO to plants. Further examinations using two Cd concentrations (0.1 and 1 mg/L) showed that nano-ZnO did not influence the inhibitory effect of 0.1 mg/L Cd, but significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the stress of 1 mg/L Cd to the duckweed. The index D665/D665a reflected that the toxic effect of 1 mg/L Cd was significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed by nano-ZnO. H+-ATPase was also sensitive to reveal the protective effects of nano-ZnO on the duckweed under Cd exposure. However, the responses of the antioxidant enzymes SOD and CAT failed to reflect the effects of nano-ZnO on Cd toxicity. Hysteretic addition of nano-ZnO for 24 h showed that the protective effects of nano-ZnO were weakened. Our results suggest that the adsorption of Cd to nano-ZnO may result in lower Cd uptake by L. minor, thus reducing its toxicity. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available