4.8 Article

VACCINOLOGY Structural topology defines protective CD8+ T cell epitopes in the HIV proteome

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 364, Issue 6439, Pages 480-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav5095

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. CHAVI-ID
  3. Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard
  4. NIH HIVRAD grant [P01AI104715]
  5. Harvard University Center for AIDS Research [P30 AI060354]
  6. U.S. National Institutes of Health: NIAID
  7. U.S. National Institutes of Health: NICHD
  8. U.S. National Institutes of Health: NIMH
  9. U.S. National Institutes of Health: NIA
  10. CFAR Development Award
  11. Harvard Department of Ophthalmology Gragoudas-Folkman Award
  12. U.S. National Institutes of Health: NCI
  13. U.S. National Institutes of Health: NHLBI
  14. U.S. National Institutes of Health: NIDA
  15. U.S. National Institutes of Health: FIC
  16. U.S. National Institutes of Health: OAR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutationally constrained epitopes of variable pathogens represent promising targets for vaccine design but are not reliably identified by sequence conservation. In this study, we employed structure-based network analysis, which applies network theory to HIV protein structure data to quantitate the topological importance of individual amino acid residues. Mutation of residues at important network positions disproportionately impaired viral replication and occurred with high frequency in epitopes presented by protective human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I alleles. Moreover, CD8(+) T cell targeting of highly networked epitopes distinguished individuals who naturally control HIV, even in the absence of protective HLA alleles. This approach thereby provides a mechanistic basis for immune control and a means to identify CD8(+) T cell epitopes of topological importance for rational immunogen design, including a T cell-based HIV vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available