4.8 Article

Strongly correlated quantum walks with a 12-qubit superconducting processor

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 364, Issue 6442, Pages 753-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1611

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0304300, 2016YFA0302104, 2016YFA0301200, 2017YFA0303703]
  2. Chinese Academy of Science and its Strategic Priority Research Program [XDB28000000]
  3. Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipality
  4. NSFC [11574380, 11774022, 11774406, 11874212, U1530401, 11890704, U1801661]
  5. AFOSR [FA9550-14-1-0040]
  6. AOARD [FA2386-18-1-4045]
  7. ARO [W911NF-18-1-0358]
  8. JSPS
  9. JST (CREST) [JPMJCR1676]
  10. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies
  11. JST (Q-LEAP)
  12. Alibaba Cloud

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum walks are the quantum analogs of classical random walks, which allow for the simulation of large-scale quantum many-body systems and the realization of universal quantum computation without time-dependent control. We experimentally demonstrate quantum walks of one and two strongly correlated microwave photons in a one-dimensional array of 12 superconducting qubits with short-range interactions. First, in one-photon quantum walks, we observed the propagation of the density and correlation of the quasiparticle excitation of the superconducting qubit and quantum entanglement between qubit pairs. Second, when implementing two-photon quantum walks by exciting two superconducting qubits, we observed the fermionization of strongly interacting photons from the measured time-dependent long-range anticorrelations, representing the antibunching of photons with attractive interactions. The demonstration of quantum walks on a quantum processor, using superconducting qubits as artificial atoms and tomographic readout, paves the way to quantum simulation of many-body phenomena and universal quantum computation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available