4.5 Article

Risk factors of stress fractures due to the female athlete triad: Differences in teens and twenties

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 1501-1510

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sms.13464

Keywords

stress fractures; teenage; the female athlete triad

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The female athlete triad (Triad), defined by the American College of Sports Medicine as low energy availability (LEA) with or without disordered eating, menstrual dysfunction, and low bone mineral density (BMD), is associated with stress fractures and athletes aged 16-17 years are most susceptible. Purpose: To examine whether the Triad increases the risk of stress fractures, athletes were assigned to a teenage group and a 20s group. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 390 elite female athletes and was conducted from 2012 to 2016 at Japan Institute of Sports Sciences. Blood concentrations of various hormones were examined, and BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and throughout the whole body using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. LEA was defined as body weight <= 85% of the ideal body weight for teenage athletes, or BMI <= 17.5 for athletes in their 20s. Low BMD was defined as a BMD Z-score of <-1.0 in the lumbar spine and the whole body. Results: Among 390 athletes enrolled, 36 developed new stress fractures within 3 months of registration. The risk for stress fractures due to the Triad in teenage athletes was higher than for athletes in their 20s. In teenage female athletes, secondary amenorrhea, low BMD for the whole body, and a low ratio of actual body weight to ideal body weight increased the risk for stress fractures by 12.9 times, 4.5 times, and 1.1 times, respectively. Conclusion: To prevent stress fractures in female athletes with the Triad, age of athletes should be taken into consideration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available