4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

UV PHOTOCHEMICAL OXIDATION AND EXTRACTION OF MARINE DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON AT UC IRVINE: STATUS, SURPRISES, AND METHODOLOGICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Journal

RADIOCARBON
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages 1603-1617

Publisher

UNIV ARIZONA DEPT GEOSCIENCES
DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2019.9

Keywords

dissolved organic carbon; photochemical oxidation; radiocarbon dating; seawater; stable isotope; UV

Funding

  1. NSF Chemical Oceanography program [OCE-141458941, OCE-1536597]
  2. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund New Directions Grant [PRF-55430-ND2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first ultraviolet photochemical oxidation (UVox) extraction method for marine dissolved organic carbon (DOC) as CO2 gas was established by Armstrong and co-workers in 1966. Subsequent refinement of the UVox technique has co-evolved with the need for high-precision isotopic (Delta C-14, delta C-13) analysis and smaller sample size requirements for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (AMS C-14) measurements. The UVox line at UC Irvine was established in 2004 and the system reaction kinetics and efficiency for isolating seawater DOC rigorously tested for quantitative isolation of similar to 1 mg C for AMS C-14 measurements. Since then, improvements have been made to sampling, storage, and UVox methods to increase overall efficiency. We discuss our progress, and key UVox system parameters for optimizing precision, accuracy, and efficiency, including (1) ocean to reactor: filtration, storage and preparation of DOC samples, (2) cryogenic trap design, efficiency and quantification of CO2 break through, and (3) use of isotopic standards, blanks and small sample graphitization techniques for the correction of DOC concentrations and Fm values with propagated uncertainties. New DOC UVox systems are in use at many institutions. However, rigorous assessment of quantitative UVox DOC yields and blank contributions, DOC concentrations and carbon isotopic values need to be made. We highlight the need for a community-wide inter-comparison study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available