4.7 Article

Southern Greenland glaciation and Western Boundary Undercurrent evolution recorded on Eirik Drift during the late Pliocene intensification of Northern Hemisphere glaciation

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 209, Issue -, Pages 40-51

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.015

Keywords

Plio-Pleistocene transition; Northern Hemisphere glaciation; Paleoclimatology; Paleoceanography; Paleomagnetism; Greenland Ice Sheet; North Atlantic; Ice-rafted debris; Relative paleointensity

Funding

  1. European Consortium for Ocean Research Drilling (ECORD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new sedimentological and environmental magnetic records spanning similar to 3.2-2.2 Ma, during the intensification of Northern Hemisphere glaciation, from North Atlantic Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Site U1307 on Eirik Drift. Our new datasets and their high-fidelity age control demonstrate that while inland glaciers - and potentially also at times restricted iceberg-calving margins - have likely existed on southern Greenland since at least similar to 3.2 Ma, persistent and extensive iceberg-calving glacial margins were only established in this region at 2.72 Ma, similar to 300 kyr later than in northeastern and eastern Greenland. Despite a dramatic increase in Greenland-sourced ice-rafted debris deposition on Eirik Drift at this time, contemporaneous changes in the bulk magnetic properties of Site U1307 sediments, and a reduction in sediment accumulation rates, suggest a decrease in the delivery of Greenland-sourced glaciofluvial silt to our study site. We attribute these changes to a shift in depositional regime from bottom-current-dominated to glacial-IRD-dominated between similar to 2.9 and 2.7 Ma, in response to a change in the depth of the flow path of the Western Boundary Undercurrent relative to our study site. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available