3.9 Article

A density functional theory study of the oxygen reduction reaction on the (111) and (100) surfaces of cobalt(II) oxide

Journal

PROGRESS IN REACTION KINETICS AND MECHANISM
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 122-131

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1468678319825727

Keywords

Cobalt(II) oxide; oxygen reduction reaction; density functional theory; Bader charge; theory overpotential

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Programme for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in the University
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. National Key Research and Development Project [2016YFF0204402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory calculations were employed to investigate the electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction on the (111) and (100) surfaces of cobalt(II) oxide. Different mechanisms were applied to evaluate the oxygen reduction reaction performance of cobalt(II) oxide structures in terms of the Gibbs free energy and density of states. A variety of intermediate structures based on associative and dissociative mechanisms were constructed and optimized. As a result, we estimated the catalytic activity by calculating the free energy of the intermediates and constructing free energy diagrams, which suggested that the oxygen reduction reaction Gibbs free energy on cobalt(II) oxide (111) and (100) surfaces based on the associative mechanism is smaller than that based on the dissociative mechanism, demonstrating that the associative mechanism should be more likely to be the oxygen reduction reaction pathway. Moreover, the theoretical oxygen reduction reaction activity on the cobalt(II) oxide (111) surface was found to be higher than that on the cobalt(II) oxide (100) surface. These results shed light on the rational design of high-performance cobalt(II) oxide oxygen reduction reaction catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available