4.8 Article

Gasification of coal and biomass as a net carbon-negative power source for environment-friendly electricity generation in China

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812239116

Keywords

bioenergy; gasification; CCS; air pollution; carbon-negative energy

Funding

  1. National Key RD Program [2016YFC0208901]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71722003, 71690244]
  3. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Regional Environmental Quality
  4. Volvo Group in a research project of the Research Center for Green Economy and Sustainable Development, Tsinghua University
  5. Harvard Global Institute
  6. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Realizing the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 2 degrees C by the end of this century will most likely require deployment of carbon-negative technologies. It is particularly important that China, as the world's top carbon emitter, avoids being locked into carbon-intensive, coal-fired power-generation technologies and undertakes a smooth transition from high- to negative-carbon electricity production. We focus here on deploying a combination of coal and biomass energy to produce electricity in China using an integrated gasification cycle system combined with carbon capture and storage (CBECCS). Such a system will also reduce air pollutant emissions, thus contributing to China's near-term goal of improving air quality. We evaluate the bus-bar electricity-generation prices for CBECCS with mixing ratios of crop residues varying from 0 to 100%, as well as associated costs for carbon mitigation and cobenefits for air quality. We find that CBECCS systems employing a crop residue ratio of 35% could produce electricity with net-zero life-cycle emissions of greenhouse gases, with a levelized cost of electricity of no more than 9.2 US cents per kilowatt hour. A carbon price of approximately $52.0 per ton would make CBECCS cost-competitive with pulverized coal power plants. Therefore, our results provide critical insights for designing a CBECCS strategy in China to harness near-term air-quality cobenefits while laying the foundation for achieving negative carbon emissions in the long run.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available