4.8 Article

Living with plague: Lessons from the Soviet Union's antiplague system

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1817339116

Keywords

disease ecology; Yersinia pestis; USSR history; eradication programs; disease control programs

Funding

  1. Norwegian Centennial Chair Program
  2. National Science Foundation under Science, Technology and Society Program Scholar's Award [1126923]
  3. Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis
  4. University of Minnesota
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1126923] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zoonoses, such as plague, are primarily animal diseases that spill over into human populations. While the goal of eradicating such diseases is enticing, historical experience validates abandoning eradication in favor of ecologically based control strategies (which reduce morbidity and mortality to a locally accepted risk level). During the 20th century, one of the most extensive plague-eradication efforts in recorded history was undertaken to enable large-scale changes in land use in the former Soviet Union (including vast areas of central Asia). Despite expending tremendous resources in its attempt to eradicate plague, the Soviet antiplague response gradually abandoned the goal of eradication in favor of plague control linked with developing basic knowledge of plague ecology. Drawing from this experience, we combine new gray-literature sources, historical and recent research, and fieldwork to outline best practices for the control of spillover from zoonoses while minimally disrupting wildlife ecosystems, and we briefly compare the Soviet case with that of endemic plague in the western United States. We argue for the allocation of sufficient resources to maintain ongoing local surveillance, education, and targeted control measures; to incorporate novel technologies selectively; and to use ecological research to inform developing landscape-based models for transmission interruption. We conclude that living with emergent and reemergent zoonotic diseases-switching to control-opens wider possibilities for interrupting spillover while preserving natural ecosystems, encouraging adaptation to local conditions, and using technological tools judiciously and in a cost-effective way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available