4.8 Article

MAPK pathway and B cells overactivation in multiple sclerosis revealed by phosphoproteomics and genomic analysis

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818347116

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; phosphoproteomics; signaling pathways; B cells; autoimmunity

Funding

  1. European Commission (CombiMS project) [305397]
  2. Sys4MS project (Horizon2020: Eracosysmed) [43]
  3. Institute de Salud Carlos III (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional funds Otra forma de hacer Europa) [AC15-00052]
  4. Centres de Recerca de Catalunya Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysregulation of signaling pathways in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be analyzed by phosphoproteomics in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). We performed in vitro kinetic assays on PBMCs in 195 MS patients and 60 matched controls and quantified the phosphorylation of 17 kinases using xMAP assays. Phosphoprotein levels were tested for association with genetic susceptibility by typing 112 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with MS susceptibility. We found increased phosphorylation of MP2K1 in MS patients relative to the controls. Moreover, we identified one SNP located in the PHDGH gene and another on IRF8 gene that were associated with MP2K1 phosphorylation levels, providing a first clue on how this MS risk gene may act. The analyses in patients treated with disease-modifying drugs identified the phosphorylation of each receptor's downstream kinases. Finally, using flow cytometry, we detected in MS patients increased STAT1, STAT3, TF65, and HSPB1 phosphorylation in CD19(+) cells. These findings indicate the activation of cell survival and proliferation (MAPK), and proinflammatory (STAT) pathways in the immune cells of MS patients, primarily in B cells. The changes in the activation of these kinases suggest that these pathways may represent therapeutic targets for modulation by kinase inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available