4.7 Article

Exploring the Potential of Natural Products From Mangrove Rhizosphere Bacteria as Biopesticides Against Plant Diseases

Journal

PLANT DISEASE
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages 2925-2932

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-11-18-1958-RE

Keywords

cereals and grains; field crops; fungi; prokaryotes; vegetables

Categories

Funding

  1. Guangdong Innovation Research Team Fund [2014ZT05S078]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801788]
  3. Research and Development Foundation of Science and Technology of Shenzhen grant [JCYJ20180305123932369]
  4. Research Fund for Strategic Emerging and Cultural Industries of Shenzhen grant [201708021308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With increasing concerns of the environmental problems associated with current fungicide application, investigation of alternative, environmentally compatible biopesticides for plant disease management is needed. A total of 113 strains associated with Acanthus ilicifolius Linn in the Maipo Reserve, Hong Kong, were isolated and identified. In vitro assay with crude extracts of bacterial fermentation cultures identified similar to 26% of the isolates producing antimicrobial compounds against a variety of agriculturally important phytopathogens. Selected crude extracts with inhibition to Colletotrichum fructicola and Magnaporthe oryzae growth significantly suppressed anthracnose and rice blast development in pear fruits and rice plants, respectively, when applied at 50 mu g ml(-1). Furthermore, 10 of 14 selected crude extracts with good antimicrobial activities had no significant differences in toxicity to the genus Chlorella compared with the control when used at 25 mu g ml(-1), whereas Amistar Top and Mancozeb completely killed the alga under the same concentration. These data illustrate the potential of natural products from mangrove rhizosphere bacteria in future agricultural application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available