4.7 Article

Familial chilblain lupus due to a gain-of-function mutation in STING

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 468-472

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209841

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LE 1074/3-1, LE 1074/4-1, TU 421/1-2, GU1212/1-1, GU 1212/1-2]
  2. Friede Springer Stiftung
  3. TU Dresden Graduate Academy (greatlipid4all)
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Familial chilblain lupus is a monogenic form of cutaneous lupus erythematosus caused by loss-of-function mutations in the nucleases TREXI or SAMHD1. In a family without TREX1 or SAMHD1 mutation, we sought to determine the causative gene and the underlying disease pathology. Methods Exome sequencing was used for disease gene identification. Structural analysis was performed by homology modelling and docking simulations. Type I interferon (IFN) activation was assessed in cells transfected with STING cDNA using an IFN-13 reporter and Western blotting. IFN signatures in patient blood in response to tofacitinib treatment were measured by RT-PCR of IFN-stimulated genes. Results In a multigenerational family with five members affected with chilblain lupus, we identified a heterozygous mutation of STING, a signalling molecule in the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway. Structural and functional analyses indicate that mutant STING enhances homodimerisation in the absence of its ligand cGAMP resulting in constitutive type I IFN activation. Treatment of two affected family members with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor tofacitinib led to a marked suppression of the IFN signature. Conclusions A heterozygous gain-of-function mutation in STING can cause familial chilblain lupus. These findings expand the genetic spectrum of type I IFNdependent disorders and suggest that JAK inhibition may be of therapeutic value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available