4.7 Article

Observation of prompt J/ψ meson elliptic flow in high-multiplicity pPb collisions at √sNN=8.16 TeV

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 791, Issue -, Pages 172-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.018

Keywords

CMS; Heavy-ion physics; Correlation; Flow; pPb; Heavy flavor

Funding

  1. FWF (Austria)
  2. FNRS (Belgium)
  3. FWO (Belgium)
  4. CNPq (Brazil)
  5. CAPES (Brazil)
  6. FAPERJ (Brazil)
  7. FAPERGS (Brazil)
  8. FAPESP (Brazil)
  9. MES (Bulgaria)
  10. MOST (China)
  11. NSFC (China)
  12. COLCIENCIAS (Colombia)
  13. CSF (Croatia)
  14. SENESCYT (Ecuador)
  15. MoER (Estonia)
  16. ERDF (Estonia)
  17. Academy of Finland (Finland)
  18. MEC
  19. CEA
  20. CNRS/IN2P3 (France)
  21. BMBF
  22. DFG
  23. HGF (Germany)
  24. GSRT (Greece)
  25. NKFIA (Hungary)
  26. DAE
  27. DST
  28. IPM
  29. SFI (Ireland)
  30. INFN (Italy)
  31. NRF (Republic of Korea)
  32. MES (Latvia)
  33. MOE and UM (Malaysia)
  34. BUAP
  35. CONACYT
  36. UASLP-FAI (Mexico)
  37. MSHE
  38. FCT (Portugal)
  39. JINR (Dubna)
  40. RFBR
  41. MESTD (Serbia)
  42. SEIDI
  43. FEDER (Spain)
  44. Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland)
  45. TUBITAK
  46. TAEK
  47. NASU
  48. SFFR
  49. NSF (USA)
  50. Marie-Curie programme
  51. European Research Council
  52. Horizon 2020 Grant [675440]
  53. Leventis Foundation
  54. A.P. Sloan Foundation
  55. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  56. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  57. Fonds pour la Formation a la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture(FRIA-Belgium)
  58. Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (IWT-Belgium)
  59. FWO (Belgium) under the Excellence of Science - EOS [30820817]
  60. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) of the Czech Republic
  61. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences [123842, 123959, 124845, 124850, 125105]
  62. Council of Science and Industrial Research, India
  63. HOMING PLUS programme of the Foundation for Polish Science
  64. European Union, Regional Development Fund [Harmonia 2014/14/M/ST2/00428, 2014/13/B/ST2/02543, 2014/15/B/ST2/03998, 2015/19/B/ST2/02861]
  65. Sonata-bis [2012/07/E/ST2/01406]
  66. National Priorities Research Program by Qatar National Research Fund
  67. Programa Estatal de Fomento de la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnica de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu [MDM-2015-0509]
  68. Programa Severo Ochoa del Principado de Asturias
  69. Thalis
  70. EU-ESF
  71. Greek NSRF
  72. Rachadapisek Sompot Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University
  73. Welch Foundation [C-1845]
  74. Weston Havens Foundation (USA)
  75. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N001273/1, ST/N000242/1, ST/M004775/1, ST/K003542/1 GRID PP, ST/L005603/1, ST/K003542/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  76. STFC [ST/N001273/1, ST/L005603/1, ST/N000242/1, ST/K003542/1, ST/M004775/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A measurement of the elliptic flow (v(2)) of prompt J/psi mesons in high-multiplicity pPbcollisions is reported using data collected by the CMS experiment at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy root s(NN)= 8.16 TeV. Prompt J/psi mesons decaying into two muons are reconstructed in the rapidity region in the nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass frame (y(cm)), corresponding to either -2.86 < y(cm) < -1.86 or 0.94 < y(cm)< 1.94. The average v(2) result from the two rapidity ranges is reported over the transverse momentum (p(T)) range from 0.2 to 10 GeV. Positive v(2) values are observed for the prompt J/psi meson, as extracted from long-range two-particle correlations with charged hadrons, for 2 < p(T) < 8 GeV. The prompt J/psi results are compared with previous CMS measurements of elliptic flow for open charm mesons (D-0) and strange hadrons. From these measurements, constraints can be obtained on the collective dynamics of charm quarks produced in high-multiplicity events arising from small systems. (c) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available