4.8 Article

Precision Analysis of the 136Xe Two-Neutrino ββ Spectrum in KamLAND-Zen and Its Impact on the Quenching of Nuclear Matrix Elements

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 122, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.192501

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [21000001, 26104002, 18K03639]
  2. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. DOE
  6. NSF
  7. NII
  8. JICFuS
  9. CNS-RIKEN joint project for large-scale nuclear structure calculations
  10. U.S. DOE [DE-FG02-00ER41132]
  11. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-14-0524]
  12. European Regional Development Fund-Project Engineering applications of microworld physics [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000766]
  13. MEXT
  14. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K03639, 26104002] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a precision analysis of the Xe-136 two-neutrino beta beta electron spectrum above 0.8 MeV, based on high-statistics data obtained with the KamLAND-Zen experiment. An improved formalism for the two-neutrino beta beta rate allows us to measure the ratio of the leading and subleading 2 nu beta beta nuclear matrix elements (NMEs), xi(2 nu)(31) = -0.26(-0.25)(+0.31). Theoretical predictions from the nuclear shell model and the majority of the quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) calculations are consistent with the experimental limit. However, part of the xi(2 nu)(31) range allowed by the QRPA is excluded by the present measurement at the 90% confidence level. Our analysis reveals that predicted xi(2 nu)(31) values are sensitive to the quenching of NMEs and the competing contributions from low- and high-energy states in the intermediate nucleus. Because these aspects are also at play in neutrinoless beta beta decay, xi(2 nu)(31) provides new insights toward reliable neutrinoless beta beta NMEs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available