4.7 Article

Improved survival in rheumatoid arthritis: a general population-based cohort study

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 408-413

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-209058

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [P60-AR-047785]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Mortality trends of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are largely unknown over the past decade when new drugs and management strategies have been adopted to effectively treat RA. Methods Using The Health Improvement Network, an electronic medical record database representative of the UK general population, we identified patients with incident RA and up to five individuals without RA matched for age, sex and year of diagnosis between 1999 and 2014. The RA cohort was divided in two subcohorts based on the year of RA diagnosis: the early cohort (1999-2006) and the late cohort (2007-2014). We compared mortality rates, HRs (using a Cox proportional hazard model) and rate differences (using an additive hazard model) between RA and non-RA cohorts adjusting for potential confounders. Results Patients with RA diagnosed between 1999 and 2006 had a considerably higher mortality rate than their comparison cohort (ie, 29.1 vs 18.0 deaths/1 000 person-years), as compared with a moderate difference in patients with RA diagnosed between 2007 and 2014 and their comparison cohort (17.0 vs 12.9 deaths/1000 years). The corresponding absolute mortality rate differences were 9.5 deaths/1000 person-years (95% Cls 7.5 to 11.6) and 3.1 deaths/1 000 person-years (95% Cl 1.5 to 4.6) and the mortality HRs were 1.56 (95% Cl 1.44 to 1.69) and 1.29 (95% Cl 1.17 to 1.42), respectively (both p values for interaction < 0.01). Conclusion This general population-based cohort study indicates that the survival of patients with RA has improved over the past decade to a greater degree than in the general population. Improved management of RA and its associated comorbidities over recent years may be providing a survival benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available