4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of pore size in bone regeneration using polydopamine-laced hydroxyapatite collagen calcium silicate scaffolds fabricated by 3D mould printing technology

Journal

ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 127-133

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12261

Keywords

bone regeneration; CSD; HCCS-PDA; pore size

Funding

  1. NIH/NIDCR [R01DE022816]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structured AbstractObjective The pore size of the scaffold is a critical factor in repairing large bone defect. Here, we investigated the potential of bone regeneration using novel nanocomposite polydopamine-laced hydroxyapatite collagen calcium silicate (HCCS-PDA) scaffolds with two different pore sizes, 250 and 500 mu m. Samples/Setting A total of 12 male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with HCCS-PDA scaffold with pore size of either 250 or 500 mu m into surgically created critical-sized defect (CSD). Methods HCCS-PDA scaffolds were fabricated using mould printing technique. The effect of pore size on mechanical strength of the scaffolds was assessed by compression testing. After seeding with rat mesenchymal stem cells (rMSCs), the scaffolds were implanted, and new bone formation was evaluated using microCT and histomorphometric analysis after 8 weeks. Results MicroCT and histology analysis demonstrated restricted peripheral new bone formation in either dural or periosteal side and limited new bone formation in the 250 mu m pore scaffold. Conversely, the 500-mu m pore scaffold showed more penetration of new bone into the scaffold and greater bone regeneration in the rat CSD. Conclusion Based on our results, which demonstrated improved new bone formation in 500 mu m pores scaffold, we can conclude that effective scaffold pore size that induces osteointegration and bone regeneration is around 500 mu m for HCCS-PDA nanocomposite scaffold.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available