4.6 Article

In-situ measurement of the density ratio of K-Rb hybrid vapor cell using spin-exchange collision mixing of the K and Rb light shifts

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 16169-16183

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.016169

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0501601]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61773043, 61721091, 61227902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate a new method that enables the direct measurement of the density ratio of a K-Rb hybrid vapor cell, using the spin-exchange collision mixing of the K and Rb light shifts. The densities for each alkali metals can he further determined using Raoult's law. The mixture of the light shifts in both magnetometers and comagnetometers is formulated using Bloch equations and explained by considering the fast spin exchange interaction. The relationship between the density ratio and the mixed light shifts is both formulated and simulated. The method was performed on several K-Rb magnetometer- and K-Rb-(21)Nc comagnetometer-cells at different temperatures, pump light powers, and mole fractions of K. The method was further verified by the conventional laser-absorption-spectroscopy method. The new approach has the advantage to measure the density ratio of the optically-thick hybrid alkali atoms, while requiring no additional magnetic field necessary for conventional magnetic-field induced Faraday-rotation techniques. It also has the advantage of in-situ measuring the density ratio under exactly the normal operation of the devices, which leans that the errors caused by the heating effect of the strong pump light and the temperature drift during long-term operation can he real time monitored. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available