4.6 Article

Dirty-data-based alarm prediction in self-optimizing large-scale optical networks

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 10631-10643

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.010631

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. China State Grid Corp Science and Technology Project [5210ED180047]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX03001016]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61822105, 61571058, 61601052]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems Networks of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machine-learning-based solutions are showing promising results for several critical issues in large-scale optical networks. Alarm (caused by failure, disaster, etc.) prediction is an important use-case, where machine learning can assist in predicting events, ahead of time. Accurate prediction enables network administrators to undertake preventive measures. For such alarm prediction applications, high-quality data sets for training and testing are crucial. However, the collected performance and alarm data from large-scale optical networks are often dirty, i.e., these data are incomplete, inconsistent, and lack certain behaviors or trends. Such data are likely to contain several errors, when collected from old-fashioned optical equipment, in particular. Even after appropriate data preprocessing, feature distribution can be extremely unbalanced, limiting the performance of machine learning algorithms. This paper demonstrates a Dirty-data-based Alarm Prediction (DAP) method for Self-Optimizing Optical Networks (SOONs). Experimental results on a commercial large-scale field topology with 274 nodes and 487 links demonstrate that the proposed DAP method can achieve high accuracy for different types of alarms. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available